<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Landed in lax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.willwarriner.com/thoughts/2008/01/03/landed-in-lax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.willwarriner.com/thoughts/2008/01/03/landed-in-lax/</link>
	<description>The Next Chapter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:40:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: suzanne</title>
		<link>http://www.willwarriner.com/thoughts/2008/01/03/landed-in-lax/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>suzanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwarriner.com/thoughts/2008/01/03/landed-in-lax/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Hi Will!  Happy New Year.  :)

Kinda freaky that the screen wasn&#039;t accurate... good thing it wasn&#039;t what the pilot was relying on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Will!  Happy New Year.  :)</p>
<p>Kinda freaky that the screen wasn&#8217;t accurate&#8230; good thing it wasn&#8217;t what the pilot was relying on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.willwarriner.com/thoughts/2008/01/03/landed-in-lax/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwarriner.com/thoughts/2008/01/03/landed-in-lax/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>It depends on how they measured it.

There are two ways for a plane to read their altitude:

* Directly with some kind of fancy radar.

* Estimating, by measuring the outside air pressure and comparing it with a reference value.  The higher up you go, the less air pressure there is.

This latter method is what is commonly used for flights: the plane is not exactly at 33000 feet cruising, but &quot;is flying at the height where the outside pressure is value X.&quot;.   

The cockpit instruments switch from estimating to the direct measurements at a certain height (that is, when it is landing or taking off)

It sounds like your in-flight info screen didn&#039;t make that switch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends on how they measured it.</p>
<p>There are two ways for a plane to read their altitude:</p>
<p>* Directly with some kind of fancy radar.</p>
<p>* Estimating, by measuring the outside air pressure and comparing it with a reference value.  The higher up you go, the less air pressure there is.</p>
<p>This latter method is what is commonly used for flights: the plane is not exactly at 33000 feet cruising, but &#8220;is flying at the height where the outside pressure is value X.&#8221;.   </p>
<p>The cockpit instruments switch from estimating to the direct measurements at a certain height (that is, when it is landing or taking off)</p>
<p>It sounds like your in-flight info screen didn&#8217;t make that switch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

